Flare is an image endpoint, not a chat model. Streaming, function calling, and structured outputs are all unsupported, so it slots into a pipeline as a generation step rather than as something you converse with directly.
Budgeting takes measurement. OpenAI notes that the GPT Image 2 token calculator does not estimate GPT Image 2.5 consumption, so the only reliable way to forecast cost is to run a representative batch and read the real numbers. Rate limits are also capped in images per minute — five per minute at the entry usage tier — which matters if you were planning genuinely high-volume work.
Outputs carry C2PA metadata and invisible watermarking, and prompts and images pass through safety checks. That is worth knowing if provenance signals affect where your images end up, not a reason to avoid the model.
And this generation is an editing and speed release more than a leap in raw output quality. If your complaint about the last model was the look of a first-shot image rather than what happened on edit three, Flare will feel more like a refinement than a new tool.